October 15, 2008

Elections Are Done For Me

(Posted by mordaxus)
I Think I Voted

Forty Percent of California voters are "permanent absentee" voters. Oregon runs entirely by mail-in votes. Other US states have some sort of mail-in or absentee status that people can assign themselves to.

For those people, including me, elections are a slice of time that ends on election day. This isn't new, until relatively recently, it all worked that way. You couldn't expect everyone to all be in town on that one day. It is only urbanization that allows us to have elections be an event rather than a process. I sat down last night and waded through the whole mass of offices, measures, and initiatives. I have now completed my civic duty.

This is probably a good idea, as many of the issues with voting and counting votes and securing them have in their model that it has to be done on one day, and as quickly as possible after the polls close. It improves security and accountability to allow and encourage people to vote over an interval of a few weeks.

Posted by mordaxus on October 15, 2008 at 4:25 PM in Security , Voting . You can: comment, view comments (6), search Technorati.

Bookmark this post:

August 29, 2008

44 Years

(Posted by adam)
Fannie Lou Hamer.jpg

Mary Dudziak posted the testimony of Fannie Lou Hamer before the credentials committee of the 1964 Democratic convention. It's worth reading in full:

Mr. Chairman, and to the Credentials Committee, my name is Mrs. Fannie Lou Hamer, and I live at 626 East Lafayette Street, Ruleville, Mississippi, Sunflower County, the home of Senator James O. Eastland, and Senator Stennis.

It was the 31st of August in 1962 that eighteen of us traveled twenty-six miles to the county courthouse in Indianola to try to register to become first-class citizens.

We was met in Indianola by policemen, Highway Patrolmen, and they only allowed two of us in to take the literacy test at the time. After we had taken this test and started back to Ruleville, we was held up by the City Police and the State Highway Patrolmen and carried back to Indianola where the bus driver was charged that day with driving a bus the wrong color.

After we paid the fine among us, we continued on to Ruleville, and Reverend Jeff Sunny carried me four miles in the rural area where I had worked as a timekeeper and sharecropper for eighteen years. I was met there by my children, who told me that the plantation owner was angry because I had gone down to try to register.

After they told me, my husband came, and said the plantation owner was raising Cain because I had tried to register. Before he quit talking the plantation owner came and said, "Fannie Lou, do you know - did Pap tell you what I said?"

And I said, "Yes, sir."

He said, "Well I mean that." He said, "If you don't go down and withdraw your registration, you will have to leave." Said, "Then if you go down and withdraw," said, "you still might have to go because we are not ready for that in Mississippi."

And I addressed him and told him and said, "I didn't try to register for you. I tried to register for myself."

I had to leave that same night.

On the 10th of September 1962, sixteen bullets was fired into the home of Mr. and Mrs. Robert Tucker for me. That same night two girls were shot in Ruleville, Mississippi. Also Mr. Joe McDonald's house was shot in.

And June the 9th, 1963, I had attended a voter registration workshop; was returning back to Mississippi. Ten of us was traveling by the Continental Trailway bus. When we got to Winona, Mississippi, which is Montgomery County, four of the people got off to use the washroom, and two of the people - to use the restaurant - two of the people wanted to use the washroom.

The four people that had gone in to use the restaurant was ordered out. During this time I was on the bus. But when I looked through the window and saw they had rushed out I got off of the bus to see what had happened. And one of the ladies said, "It was a State Highway Patrolman and a Chief of Police ordered us out."...

I was carried to the county jail and put in the booking room. They left some of the people in the booking room and began to place us in cells. I was placed in a cell with a young woman called Miss Ivesta Simpson. After I was placed in the cell I began to hear sounds of licks and screams, I could hear the sounds of licks and horrible screams. And I could hear somebody say, "Can you say, 'yes, sir,' nigger? Can you say 'yes, sir'?"

And they would say other horrible names.

She would say, "Yes, I can say 'yes, sir.'"

"So, well, say it."

She said, "I don't know you well enough."

They beat her, I don't know how long. And after a while she began to pray, and asked God to have mercy on those people.

And it wasn't too long before three white men came to my cell. One of these men was a State Highway Patrolman and he asked me where I was from. I told him Ruleville and he said, "We are going to check this."

They left my cell and it wasn't too long before they came back. He said, "You are from Ruleville all right," and he used a curse word. And he said, "We are going to make you wish you was dead."

I was carried out of that cell into another cell where they had two Negro prisoners. The State Highway Patrolmen ordered the first Negro to take the blackjack.

The first Negro prisoner ordered me, by orders from the State Highway Patrolman, for me to lay down on a bunk bed on my face.

I laid on my face and the first Negro began to beat. I was beat by the first Negro until he was exhausted. I was holding my hands behind me at that time on my left side, because I suffered from polio when I was six years old.

After the first Negro had beat until he was exhausted, the State Highway Patrolman ordered the second Negro to take the blackjack.

The second Negro began to beat and I began to work my feet, and the State Highway Patrolman ordered the first Negro who had beat me to sit on my feet - to keep me from working my feet. I began to scream and one white man got up and began to beat me in my head and tell me to hush.

One white man - my dress had worked up high - he walked over and pulled my dress - I pulled my dress down and he pulled my dress back up.

I was in jail when Medgar Evers was murdered.

All of this is on account of we want to register, to become first-class citizens. And if the Freedom Democratic Party is not seated now, I question America. Is this America, the land of the free and the home of the brave, where we have to sleep with our telephones off the hooks because our lives be threatened daily, because we want to live as decent human beings, in America?

Thank you.

Posted by adam on August 29, 2008 at 11:11 AM in Liberty , Voting . You can: comment, view comments (4), search Technorati.

Bookmark this post:

August 24, 2008

Diebold/Premier vote dropping

(Posted by adam)
A voting system used in 34 states contains a critical programming error that can cause votes to be dropped while being electronically transferred from memory cards to a central tallying point, the manufacturer acknowledges.

The problem was identified after complaints from Ohio elections officials following the March primary there, but the logic error that is the root of the problem has been part of the software for 10 years, said Chris Riggall, a spokesman for Premier Election Solutions, formerly known as Diebold.

So reports the Washington Post. Wow.

When Congress acts in haste, a la the HAVA fiasco, we all repent at leisure.

Posted by adam on August 24, 2008 at 8:26 PM in Software , Voting . You can: comment, view comments (0), search Technorati.

Bookmark this post:

August 15, 2008

XKCD On The Value of AV

(Posted by arthur)

xkcd_voting_machines.png

Posted by arthur on August 15, 2008 at 9:55 AM in Voting . You can: comment, view comments (0), see trackbacks (0) or search Technorati.

Bookmark this post:

June 4, 2008

The Emergent Chaos of the Elections

(Posted by adam)
First, congratulations to Barack Obama. His organization and victory were impressive. Competing with a former President and First Lady who was the shoo-in candidate is an impressive feat.

I'd like to talk about the Obama strategies and a long chaotic campaign in two ways. First in fund-raising and second, on the effects of a long campaign.

In fund-raising, everything I've read says that the Clintons were much better at getting the "big" donations allowed under McCain-Fiengold. (Which I've commented on here and here.) What I now want to say is that the "chaos" strategy of enabling lots and lots of small donations seems to have worked spectacularly. Letting your supporters self-select, emerge, and then working them over and over. In fact, Dissent commented that her name was added to their list when she made a media inquiry. Highly chaotic, no big one-night rubber chicken totals, and highly effective.

As an aside, I know that oftentimes in startups, we've ended up quixotically pursuing big deals, because big deals can be given attention. The strategy of using channels and having lots of little sales can be harder to advocate for.

Secondly, voter engagement is at a high everywhere in the country. Pundits often complain about low voter turnout, low engagement with the process, and people not caring. It seems that a little chaos, diverse candidates, and having a winner emerge from the contest are healthier for democracy than having the pundits select a winner.

We'd like to thank everyone who paid attention to our primary endorsements.

Posted by adam on June 4, 2008 at 11:08 AM in Liberty , Voting . You can: comment, view comments (7), see trackbacks (0) or search Technorati.

Bookmark this post:

February 26, 2008

January 4, 2008

Ohio Voters May Demand Paper Ballots

(Posted by arthur)

Ohio Secretary or State Jennifer Brunner announced yesterday that paper ballots must be provided on request.

Poll workers won't be told to offer the option to voters but must provide a ballot if requested to help "avoid any loss of confidence by voters that their ballot has been accurately cast or recorded," a directive from Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner said. The paper ballots would be counted by optical scanners at county elections boards.

The Ohio ACLU is against having paper ballots available in the primary, claiming that not having scanners at the local polling locations is against state and federal laws mandating that voters have to know if they made a mistake such as casting too many or too few votes when filling out the ballot.

But Brunner said after consulting with the attorney general's office, she thinks the ACLU is "flat wrong" and that voters will be adequately educated to avoid unintended over-votes and under-votes -- problems that plagued the punch-card voting system that the electronic machines replaced.

Even so, Brunner told The Dispatch that said she is re- thinking her previous recommendation that no ballots be counted in the precincts, after activists argued that would eliminate a way to verify whether the final results are accurate.

The option for having paper ballots is in response to feedback in response the report issued last month by Brunner's office revealing several critical vulnerabilities in currently available electronic voting systems. Brunner has also recommended that Ohio move to all paper ballots for the November election and has asked that the state legislature Gov. Strickland approve and fund the change.

The executive report is long but very educational and well worth reading, especially the recommendations. The full details are also online as well. California also recently released their own extensive reviews some of which were leveraged for the Ohio study. I've only skimmed portions of it so far, but by all reports, it is also very enlightening.

Speaking of California, the Secretary of State Bowen, has announced some very impressive new requirements for the use of electronic voting. This is great stuff, that helps deal with the issues of existing machines while still allowing the democratic process to move forward. Hopefully other states will follow suit.

Posted by arthur on January 4, 2008 at 10:44 AM in Voting . You can: comment, view comments (1), see trackbacks (0) or search Technorati.

Bookmark this post:

February 27, 2007

Vote Positively With Your Pocketbook

(Posted by mordaxus)

Adam Frucci at Gizmodo is calling for action, "Putting Our Money Where Our Mouths Are: Boycott the RIAA in March."

I don't disagree with him on the basics. I believe that consumer revolt is a misunderstood power. If you don't believe me, I can prove it with one TLA: DAT. If your response to that is, "Huh?" then you've proved me right. The details of that are another essay, however.

However, there's more to it than that. Boycotts are not as effective as purchase-shifting. If you just don't buy any CDs, then one line in an accountant's ledger will go down. The conclusion they're going draw is that this means they have to hold tighter to what they have. There are no atheists in foxholes, but there are clinchpoops, and they clinch their poop tighter.

Subscribing to eMusic is good idea. If you haven't, do so. If you regularly buy music, you will find enough things on eMusic that the monthly fee will save you a penny.

Better, go to CDBaby, Yep Roc, Compadre, and others. Even better, many,many small artists sell their music from their own web sites, often through a small label. As nice as eMusic is, relatively little of the money you give them will get in the hands of the musicians, and buying CDs as close as possible to the musicians themselves is the best way to get them what they deserve. Don't wait for Friday, do it now.

Posted by mordaxus on February 27, 2007 at 6:50 PM in Voting . You can: comment, view comments (2), search Technorati.

Bookmark this post:

February 25, 2007

A telling remark

(Posted by cwalsh)


In the "inconvenient coincidences" category, it seems that Al Sharpton's great-grandfather was a slave owned by relatives of the late segregationist US senator Strom Thurmond.

Thurmond's niece, Ellen Senter (via an AP report) provides an interesting perspective:

I doubt you can find many native South Carolinians today whose family, if you traced them back far enough, didn't own slaves," said Senter, 61, of Columbia, South Carolina.

Except, that is, for the ones who were slaves, Mrs. Senter.

Posted by cwalsh on February 25, 2007 at 6:37 PM in Liberty , Voting . You can: comment, view comments (11), see trackbacks (0) or search Technorati.

Bookmark this post:

December 4, 2006

NIST and Voting Machines

(Posted by adam)
suffragettes-protest.jpg Ed Felten points out that "NIST Recommends Decertifying Paperless Voting Machines:"
In an important development in e-voting policy, NIST has issued a report recommending that the next-generation federal voting-machine standards be written to prevent (re-)certification of today’s paperless e-voting systems. ... The new report is notable for its direct tone and unequivocal recommendation against unverifiable paperless voting systems, and for being a recommendation of NIST itself and not just of the report’s individual authors.

...

Years from now, when we look back on the recent DRE fad with what-were-we-thinking hindsight, we’ll see this NIST report as a turning point.

Photo: suffragettes, of course. At anther turning point.

Posted by adam on December 4, 2006 at 12:16 PM in Voting . You can: comment, view comments (4), search Technorati.

Bookmark this post:

November 4, 2006

More things to Do With the "Last 4"

(Posted by adam)
voting-station.jpg Apparently, in Ohio, you'll be able to vote if you know the last 4 digits of an SSN. As the Cleveland Plain Dealer reports:
Voters who don't have identification will be able to vote at next week's election by presenting the last four digits of their Social Security number and casting a provisional ballot.
Will they be distributing lists to the polling places? If so, when if the lists are stolen, and people can access credit cards, phone records, and lord knows what else, will the loss of control be reported?

Via Jonathan Adler at Volokh, "Ohio Voter ID Case Settled." Photo by Mike Benedetti.

Posted by adam on November 4, 2006 at 1:07 PM in Voting , breach analysis . You can: comment, view comments (0), search Technorati.

Bookmark this post:

October 30, 2006

The Hugo Chavez Test for Voting Machines

(Posted by adam)
malcomx.jpgAt first I thought that the stories around Sequoia Voting Systems and Smartmatic having connections to Hugo Chavez were silly. I still do think that, but I also think that they're coming out for an important reason: we have lost trust in the machinery of voting, and that is a criminal shame.

The right to vote, and to have one's vote counted is fundamental to how and why we accept our government, even when it makes colossal mistakes. This is an ideal which people around the world recognize and aspire to. The imprint of legitimacy which an election confers on a leader is important enough that even the Soviets faked elections so they could claim that mantle.

If we had voting systems that were trustworthy, transparent and understood by those operating them, then we could buy our voting machines from Hugo Chavez or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and not have to worry a lot about it. We do not, and cannot. We have transitioned from paper ballots and their understood problems into a brave new world of computerized and untrustworthy voting systems, and we are poorer for it.

I propose we call this the Hugo Chavez test, and see how all new voting technology fares under the test. We could realistically consider buying paper ballots, punch cards, or other verifiable voting technologies from the Chavez government, and be reasonably confident in our ability to test them and be sure we were getting what we specified. (I'm confident someone will point out an exceptionally clever trick, so read the comments.) I'm also confident that we can't say the same of any computerized system on the market today. Our ability to audit them is simply too lacking, and the skills to do so too rare.

The photo is Malcom X, because we sometimes forget that within living memory, not all Americans had a right to vote. We forget that that right was important enough for Malcom X to declare 1964 might be be the "year of the ballot or the bullet." That the ballot is so powerful that men ready to commit acts of violence could be placated by giving them the right to vote. It's an important right, and the value of trust that our votes are counted accurately and securely is nearly incalculable.

Posted by adam on October 30, 2006 at 11:45 AM in Voting . You can: comment, view comments (3), search Technorati.

Bookmark this post:

October 21, 2006

Diebold goes open source

(Posted by cwalsh)

Well, not intentionally.

Seems that multiple versions of source code (including the one used to run the 2004 primaries in Maryland) were delivered anonymously to a former legislator who has been critical of Diebold.

Note that this is not the same source examined by Avi Rubin, et. al., and found wanting from a security perspective.

The Baltimore Sun has more.

Posted by cwalsh on October 21, 2006 at 10:02 PM in Voting . You can: comment, view comments (0), see trackbacks (0) or search Technorati.

Bookmark this post:

October 4, 2006

Detecting Election Fraud

(Posted by arthur)

odd-frame.jpgThanks to my lovely spouse, I came across a series of fascinating papers by Walter R. Mebane, Jr. a professor of Government at Cornell. These papers use statistics, specifically Benford's Law, to detect election fraud. Now I know statisticians, and I am no statistician (and boy howdy is my higher level math rusty), but the papers were still relatively easy to read and follow. Dr Mebane's most recent paper, Election Forensics: The Second-digit Benford's Law Test and Recent American Presidential Elections, was written for the Election Fraud Conference, which was held last week out in Salt Lake City, Utah. I haven't had a chance to read through any of the other papers yet, but I'm sure they are equally interesting.

Posted by arthur on October 4, 2006 at 2:42 PM in Voting , conferences . You can: comment, view comments (1), see trackbacks (0) or search Technorati.

Bookmark this post: