500th Post

(Posted by adam)

In the 195 days since I started this blog, I've posted 499 times: This is the 500th. I'd planned, when I started, for about one long post a day. It hasn't always worked that way. I'm posting slightly more than 2.5 posts a day. I'm think I'm now getting more comments than I post, but don't have an easy way to graph that to check.

I would like to hear from readers: Is there stuff that you'd like to hear more about? Is there stuff that bores you? (Shoot, Choicepoint is starting to bore me, but I think its useful to roundup what's being said. I will try to post more non-Choicepoint stuff over the next few days.)

Are the small bits useful at all? Do you mind posts that come from BoingBoing or Slashdot? I try to avoid those unless I have an analysis that I think is interesting, figuring that if you care, you'll see it there.

Posted by adam on March 2, 2005 at 11:47 AM in Usability . You can: comment, view comments (3), see trackbacks (1) or search Technorati.

Bookmark this post:

TrackBacks

Trackbacks are links generated by other blogs which have commented on this entry.

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 500th Post:

» Short ones... from Financial Cryptography
Hop on a plane, land, and discover Adam has posted 13 blog entries, including one that asks for more topics! Congrats on 500 posts! He posts on some testimony: " the only part of our national security apparatus that actually... [Read More]

Comments

Congratulations on sticking with your blogging. I enjoy it very much.

I like the posts on security, privacy, crypto and financial issues, although I agree that ChoicePoint is getting old. I also enjoy the BB and /. commentary, especially BB as they don't allow comments any more and this gives us a place to respond.

Posted by: Cypherpunk | March 2, 2005 2:16 PM


"Stay the course, Neddy, you're doing fine!" I.e., no complaints. I don't read /. or BB, and I appreciate not having to (because you filter them into useful info).

But, wait! Why is it that "Name and email address are required."?!

Posted by: na | March 2, 2005 8:54 PM


Ironic, isn't it? I've lazily left the defaults in place.

Posted by: adam | March 2, 2005 8:59 PM