2-Fingerprint Border ID System Called Inadequate (washingtonpost.com)

(Posted by adam)

Rep. Jim Turner (D-Tex.) wrote that a study by researchers at Stanford University concluded the two-finger system "is no more than 53 percent effective in matching fingerprints with poor image quality against the government's biometric terrorist watch-list." Turner said the system falls far short of keeping the country secure.
Its not clear to me why they use this system, which a great many people (correctly) feel treats all visitors to the US as criminals, and now turns out to be inaccurate. A hand-geometry system would be more accurate, harder to alter, and less offensive.

(From 2-Fingerprint Border ID System Called Inadequate (washington post).)

Posted by adam on October 22, 2004 at 5:14 PM in Security . You can: see trackbacks (0) or search Technorati.

Bookmark this post: